US Congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick: No Choice But to Open an Impeachment Inquiry

I’m no expert on Constitutional Law buy I thought it was within the HOUSE RIGHTS that when a member of Article 2 refused a “legitimate” subpoena from The House that The House could send over the Sargent at Arms with guards, make an arrest of the individual and “detain” them until such time that they could “answer” the subpoena and respond to charges! WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THAT.. OR AM I JUST WRONG??? SOMEBODY PLEASE EXPLAIN THAT TO ME.. ??

“MR. SPEAKER, I HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY AS A CONGRESSWOMAN, FORMER PROSECUTOR, AND AMERICAN CITIZEN TO STAND UP FOR THE RULE OF LAW.

AFTER COUNTLESS CONVERSATIONS WITH MY CONSTITUENTS, AFTER SPEAKING WITH LEGAL SCHOLARS AND EXPERTS, REVIEWING THE MUELLER REPORT, AND AFTER SEEING ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS DEFY CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS, I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MUST OPEN AN IMPEACH. INQUIRY IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.

FOLLOWING MUELLER’S ALARMING REPORT IT IS OUR JOB AS A CONGRESS TO CONDUCT OVERSIGHT AND DELIVER ANSWERS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

UNFORTUNATELY, THE PRESIDENT HAS CALLED HIS ADMINISTRATION TO BREAK THE LAW AND IGNORE OUR CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS.

NOW WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO OPEN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

THIS SHOULD NOT BE A PARTISAN FIGHT OR A DEBATE ABOUT ELECTION STRATEGY.

IT’S ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW.

I KNOW IMPEACHMENT IS RISKY, BUT ALLOWING THIS PRESIDENT TO DEFY THE LAW IS EVEN MORE RISKY.

IF WE DON’T ACT NOW, OUR DEMOCRACY MAY BE THREATENED FOR YEARS TO COME. MR. SPEAKER, I YIELD BACK.”

https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/us-congresswoman-ann-kirkpatrick-no-choice-but-to-open-an-impeachment-inquiry/#like-63952

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.